Saturday, 27 July 2013

By on July 27th, 2013 in netflix, science kits

09:14 – We got an order for a biology kit overnight, to be shipped to Australia. That’s the first order we’ve gotten from Australia. Well, the first valid order, anyway. We got an order from Australia a few days ago for a chemistry kit, but the buyer hadn’t added the shipping surcharge. I emailed him to tell him we couldn’t ship until he’d paid the shipping surcharge, but I haven’t heard back from him.

Barbara is out running errands this morning. This afternoon, she’ll be labeling bottles for 30 sets each of the two forensic science kit supplements. She may also get started on labeling another set of bottles for 60 biology kits. Which reminds me that I need to check our inventory of empty bottles. We use the things by the thousands, and we stock seven or eight different types of bottles.


12:39 – It’s raining. Again. Officially, we have “only” about 5 inches (12.5 cm) of rain month-to-date. At our house, we’ve had over 8 inches (20 cm) MTD through yesterday. Today, we have monsoon weather. The instantaneous rainfall rate at the moment is about 1.5 inches per hour, with flood warnings posted by the NWS. Our rain gauge has more than 2 inches (5 cm) in it, and our front yard looks like a rice paddy.


13:39 – And an hour later we’re up from 2.1 inches to 3.6 inches DTD. I’ve decided to stop work on lab kits and start building an ark.


13:59 – Two of the annoying things about Netflix streaming are their extremely liberal definition of “New Arrivals” and their very short notice when a title is about to disappear. They list titles as “New Arrivals” that we finished watching almost a year ago. Disregarding the fact that they shouldn’t list any title that we’re current on, even if we just finished watching it yesterday, claiming titles as “new” that in fact have been available on their service for a year borders on deceptive. And when their rights to a title are about to run out, they list the expiration date, which is seldom more than a week before the title actually disappears. Certainly they must know from the time they license a title when that license expires, so why not post the expiration date immediately? Otherwise, they put their customers in the position of starting to watch a series that’ll go away before they have time to watch all of it.

The obvious problem is that for the last year or more Netflix has been forced to pay much more to license content. They obviously want to make their streaming catalog look more comprehensive and up-to-date than it actually is. They’re not doing themselves or their customers any favors by deceptively padding their new listings. I’d much rather see a new-this-week or new-this-month list that actually has only new titles than have to scroll through a bunch of stuff that’s “new” only in the minds of the Netflix marketing folks.

And, as I’ve been telling them every time I talk to them, at $8/month, their streaming price is much too low. Double it. They’ll lose some customers, sure. But not many, I suspect. At $16/month, Netflix streaming would still be a great bargain compared to what cable and satellite TV providers charge, assuming that Netflix uses that additional money to license more content.

10 Comments and discussion on "Saturday, 27 July 2013"

  1. Miles_Teg says:

    “We got an order for a biology kit overnight, to be shipped to Australia. That’s the first order we’ve gotten from Australia. Well, the first valid order, anyway. We got an order from Australia a few days ago for a chemistry kit, but the buyer hadn’t added the shipping surcharge. I emailed him to tell him we couldn’t ship until he’d paid the shipping surcharge, but I haven’t heard back from him.”

    It wasn’t me (either time).

  2. SteveF says:

    When you’re out on your ark, make sure that you do not go back and pick up a forgotten fly.

  3. SteveF says:

    There’s a comment thread at Daily Pundit that some might find amusing or thought-provoking. Or horrifying, if one is of the mindset that finds misogyny under every rock.

  4. OFD says:

    Wow, that was some horrifying stuff. I’m getting a case of the vapors here. Oh wait, that’s a chick thing from the 19th-C.

    Back now to my mindless monkey-spanking and killing things.

  5. CowboySlim says:

    “I’ve decided to stop work on lab kits and start building an ark.”

    Keep the draft consistent with very shallow waters. Regardless of the duration of the rain, 40 days and 40 nights, I have calculated the maximum amount.

    Spread evenly, as water will, over the surface of the earth, starting with 100% relative humidity around the entire earth and condensing to 0% relative humidity will result in 2 – 3 feet of water. Certainly, you will do best with a blow-up, inflatable raft type conveyance.

    (Oh, how the scientific revolution discredits the biblical gibberish.)

  6. OFD says:

    Sometimes gibberish is described in literature as metaphor. And some religious denominations do not require their adherents to believe the Bible is literal and inerrant.

  7. Lynn McGuire says:

    “I’ve decided to stop work on lab kits and start building an ark.”

    Keep the draft consistent with very shallow waters. Regardless of the duration of the rain, 40 days and 40 nights, I have calculated the maximum amount.

    Spread evenly, as water will, over the surface of the earth, starting with 100% relative humidity around the entire earth and condensing to 0% relative humidity will result in 2 – 3 feet of water. Certainly, you will do best with a blow-up, inflatable raft type conveyance.

    Did you add in all the underground oceans, lakes and aquifers? From Genesis 7:11:
    http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Genesis+5%3A32-10%3A1&version=NIV

    “11 In the six hundredth year of Noah’s life, on the seventeenth day of the second month—on that day all the springs of the great deep burst forth, and the floodgates of the heavens were opened. 12 And rain fell on the earth forty days and forty nights.”

    Just one of the aquifers under the Great State of Texas covers over 10,000 square miles (Edwards).

  8. Lynn McGuire says:

    Forgot to mention that the SF author Stephen Baxter calculated somehow that the underground water would cover the surface to the top of the Himalayas plus 300 ft in his SF book “Flood”:
    http://www.amazon.com/Flood-Stephen-Baxter/dp/0451463285/

    OK, it is a suspend all disbelief book. Still was a good read for someone living 80 ft above sea level (2013). Gotta mark the year since the global warming yahoos maintain that the seas are rising one mm per year (VBG).

  9. Miles_Teg says:

    Of course, God could just have created the water ex nihilo, and later destroyed it.

    I think the idea of a global flood isn’t necessary, and that so called “Flood Geology” is absurd. But that doesn’t mean that there wasn’t a guy called Noah who was warned about a massive local flood. That part of the world is prone to major floods.

Comments are closed.