8:55 -
I'm taking a couple of weeks off to try something I've never tried
before. Writing fiction. It's something I've always wanted to do, but
never seriously considered. Then, a couple months ago, Jerry Pournelle
called to talk about one thing or another. As usual, our conversation
got off on a tangent, and at one point we started talking about some
of his fiction projects. I asked him if he planned to do another in
the Falkenberg's Legion series. He said he did but wasn't sure when
he'd be able to get to it. I told him in jest that if he didn't hurry
up and write it, I'd write it myself. Jerry said, "Well, why don't
we co-author it?"
At that point, my bluff having been called, I hemmed and hawed
my way out of it, saying I was too busy to even consider it. But I
kept thinking about it. After finishing the manuscript Friday for the
new edition of PC Hardware in a Nutshell, I started thinking
about it some more. I emailed Jerry to ask him if he'd been serious,
or at least semi-serious about collaborating. He replied that semi-serious
was the right term, and that he was willing but didn't know if I could
write fiction. I told him that was fair enough, because I didn't
know if I could write fiction.
When I talk to fiction authors, many of them tell me that
they could never attempt what I do, because I have to deal with myriad
technical detail and get it all right. That's true enough, but I am
dealing with known facts. Fiction authors decide what happens in their
books. That may seem easier than working within a framework defined
by externalities, but a novelist has to define an entire imaginary
world and keep everything consistent. If it is to be done right, that
is a very difficult task, and one I'm not sure I'm up to.
Then there's the small matter of having to sit down and write
words. Lots of words that paint scenes, put words in the mouths of
people who don't really exist, and so on. I wasn't sure I could do
that, either. I was afraid I'd sit down at the keyboard and no words
would come. So I decided that before I did anything else I'd better
sit down and see what happened when I tried to write fictional prose.
I decided not to worry about context or anything else, just to sit
down and start writing a scene. Surprisingly enough, at least to me,
the words flowed. So, if I can get a framework to work within, I think
filling in that framework is something I can do. Not easily, certainly.
It'll be hard work. But it is something I can do.
When Jerry called Saturday, I asked him if a new Falkenberg
was the next book he wanted, or if it'd be better for me to concentrate
on something else. He said that he'd like to get the next in the Janissaries
series finished, but that it would be even harder to work in that milieu
than in the Falkenberg world. I've always believed in facing challenges
head-on, so I suggested to Jerry that I take a few days to do a detailed
read-through of the first three books in that series and then see what
I could come up with. He agreed, so that's what I'll be doing.
All of this may come to nothing. I may not have what it takes
to write good fiction. Writing well enough to meet the standards of
a novelist of the stature of Jerry Pournelle is an intimidating prospect,
or would be for most people. I'm arrogant enough to think I can do
it. I could be wrong. My best efforts might not be good enough. If
that happens, I can accept it, and have assured Jerry that my feelings
won't be hurt nor our friendship affected. But if I don't try, I'll
never know.
So I'm going to devote a couple of weeks to finding out. Jerry
may conclude that my fiction writing sucks, although if that's the
case I'm sure he'd use more diplomatic words to break the news to me.
But I may not suck. One way or another, I'm going to find out.
9:23 -
My secondary system warned me yesterday that XP expires in two weeks.
Which is fine with me. It's only running on that system for screenshots
for the book anyway. Once I'm sure that O'Reilly has everything they
need in the way of XP screenshots, that system becomes my new primary
Linux desktop system. And a nice desktop system it is, too. An Intel
D845WNL motherboard, Pentium 4/1.7G processor, 512 MB of Crucial PC133
SDRAM, an 80 GB Seagate Barracuda ATA 4 hard drive, Plextor PlexWriter
CD burner, and ATI video, all wrapped in an Antec SX-840 mid-tower
case. I may add a Seagate Travan NS-20 tape drive before I install
Red Hat 7.2 Linux.
I was actually going to blow away XP yesterday and install
Linux, but then I decided to wait a while. There's always a chance
that O'Reilly will tell me I need to reshoot one or another screen
shot, so I might just as well wait for a couple weeks or so and let
XP die a natural death. I'm curious as to what it will do when it expires.
10:27 - Arrghhh.
Screwed by FrontPage again. After publishing the updates to the HardwareGuys.com
site, I went over to look at them on the remote server. Everything
appeared fine, but something made me check the properties for the logo
at the upper left of each page. Sure enough, FrontPage had converted
the relative path to an absolute path that pointed to my local hard
drive. I hate FrontPage.
I called up one of the pages in question and examined properties
for the image. Sure enough, it had an absolute path to file:///F:/usr/THOMPSON/pair_copy_of_www_ttgnet_com/hardwareguys/images/hglogo.jpg.
So I changed the link by browsing to the image file. At that point,
the picture properties said that image would be retrieved from ../images/hglogo.jpg.
So far, so good. So I click OK to store that change. I then open Picture
Properties again, and find that it now points to the absolute path
on my hard drive. This is just hateful.
I don't need FrontPage. I need something that will let me
create and edit HTML pages visually, rather than by hand-coding the
HTML. It would be nice if that something would also do some of the
nice little things that FrontPage does, such as autothumbnailing. But
stuff like that is not essential. What I really need is a basic WSIWYG
HTML page editor. If it helps organize a site by converting the internal
links into a map, so much the better, but I think I can keep things
organized myself if necessary.
I don't want a heavy-duty product like DreamWeaver. I want
something simple to learn and simple to use, basically an HTML-enabled
Notepad or something similar. I also need an FTP client that will recurse
subdirectories and upload any changed files to the server. Any suggestions
would be appreciated. If you have any suggestions, please post them
to the messageboard. Thanks.
9:39 - Thanks for everyone's suggestions about a new HTML editor. Literally
a dozen or more packages were recommended. While all that was going
on, I had a thought myself. I remembered that when I installed Mozilla
0.9.7 it had had an editor called Composer. I decided to see if that
might be an acceptable alternative to FrontPage. I'd removed Mozilla
from my systems, though, so rather than just re-installing 0.9.7, I
decided to visit the Mozilla site to see if a later version was available.
I found that 0.9.9 had been released, so I attempted to download it.
That was an exercise in futility until I found the list of mirrors
and grabbed it from a mirror site.
After installing Mozilla 0.9.9, I played with the browser
for a while. It's obviously a usable browser, although still slower
than Opera and much slower than IE. Probably the most aggravating problem
is the slow load time, even with the memory-resident portion loaded.
When I click the Mozilla icon, sometimes the browser comes up in a
few seconds, but quite often it takes nearly 30 seconds for it to load.
I thought I could address that problem just by leaving Mozilla up and
minimized on the task bar, but that turns out not to be the case. Sometimes,
clicking on the minimized Mozilla on the task bar brings it up right
away, but often there's a long delay before the Mozilla window maximizes
and displays its contents. So I probably won't be using Mozilla as
anything but a supplemental browser.
Mozilla Composer looks like a decent product. It's missing
some of the bells and whistles of FrontPage, for example support for
autodate (which I have at the top of this page, and which automatically
updates the date and time each time the page is edited). But Mozilla
Composer does seem to have all the basic tools, and it is cross-platform,
which means I could use it on Linux as well.
I haven't figured out its Publish feature, and the help for
it is missing. I'm not entirely clear as to whether Publish publishes
only the page being edited or all changed pages on the site. Just for
the heck of it, I tried editing a page on the HardwareGuys.com site
and then clicking Publish. That brought up a dialog that I filled in
as best I could. When I clicked OK, the dialog went away, but nothing
happened as far as I could tell. No error message, and it certainly
didn't publish the page up to the server. Oh, well. I'm sure I'll figure
it out.
Thanks to everyone who has sent messages of encouragement
concerning my foray into writing fiction. Once again, this is just
an experiment. It may not work out. I'm going to spend a couple of
weeks getting up to speed on the series and knocking out some text.
Pournelle may well decide that I won't be able to hold up my end. Even
if that happens, I won't regret the experiment. One way or another,
I'll find out whether I can write fiction, which is something I don't
know now.
.
8:56 -
It feels strange to be reading Pournelle's Janissaries series of novels
and consider it "work". But that's what I've been doing. I
finished the first three books in the series yesterday and started reading
Jerry's partial draft of the fourth book and his notes. Once I get through
that, I'm going to go back and start from the beginning with another
read-through. Before I start writing, this world has to become as real to
me as it is to Jerry. I want to be living there when I start writing about
it.
I may borrow Jerry's monk-cell idea and set up a system downstairs. No
LAN connection. No Internet connection. No nothing. Just a system with a
CD burner that I can use to write on.
Even at two and a half years old, Malcolm is still a puppy. One of the
puppy things he does is steal stuff. Last night, I saw him trotting down
the hall with a roll of packing tape in his mouth. He's always so proud
when he captures something. He prances along with his head held high and
the captured object in his mouth.
We can usually tell when Malcolm has stolen something, because he
leaves something in exchange for what he's stolen. We find dog toys in
strange places. In this case, he'd stolen the packing tape from Barbara's
office and left her his green caterpillar squeaky toy in exchange. But
instead of leaving the toy in the same place he got the tape, he dropped
the toy into the laundry basket.
8:38 -
This morning, in what's getting to be the usual thing, I arrived in my
office to find my main workstation sitting at a login prompt. When I
logged in this morning, however, I got something new:
Which makes me wonder if it's NAV that's crashing my system every
night. Perhaps I'll disable LiveUpdate and see what happens.
Roland Dobbins sends me this
article from ZDNet, which says that Microsoft uses the Open Source
zlib compression library in at least nine of its major products, including
Office, and is therefore vulnerable. I think it's interesting that
Microsoft bad-mouths Open Source constantly, but turns around and
incorporates Open Source software in its own products. Alas, zlib is not
GPL'd. If it had been, Microsoft Office and the other products that use it
would have been revealed to be Open Source software immediately when this
was uncovered.
Microsoft must go nuts trying to make sure that none of their
programmers incorporates any GPL'd software in their products,
accidentally or intentionally. Were that to happen, Microsoft would
legally be compelled to release the source code for that product under the
GPL. And wouldn't that be ironic? I'm actually kind of surprised that the
Open Source folks haven't infiltrated programmers into the Beast of
Redmond.
Or perhaps they have. Perhaps Windows XP has GPL code in it and one day
Redmond will be surprised to find that the source code for XP has been
published on the Internet under the GPL, with the GPL'd source embedded
within it clearly flagged. Wouldn't that be interesting? Microsoft
managers must lose sleep worrying about just that. There could be a
ticking bomb within Microsoft's primary products even as I write this.
It's no wonder that Microsoft hates the GPL.
9:30 -
HP strikes again. In the past, I've complained frequently about their
habit of promising future support for something and later reneging on that
promise. Many people who bought various HP products on the basis of
promised support for Windows 2000 found that that support arrived late or
never. Now it seems that HP is up to their old tricks.
This article on
C|NET describes the plight of those who bought HP dvd100i DVD+RW
writers, which HP had promised would be able to write DVD-R discs after a
free firmware upgrade. As it turns out, there is no firmware upgrade to
add DVD-R write support to those drives, and apparently never will be.
HP's solution for those who want to write DVD-R discs? Buy a new HP
dvd200i drive. These new drives, due to ship next month, do what the
dvd100i was supposed to do. It seems to me that HP owes anyone who bought
a dvd100i drive a free replacement dvd200i drive. Somehow, I doubt that's
going to happen short of a class-action suit against HP.
In fairness, those who bought the competing Sony model are in the same
boat, although at least Sony is trying to find a way to upgrade their
first-generation DVD+RW drives to support writing DVD-R discs. Failing
that, they may offer some sort of trade-in program. Of course, chances are
few of our readers bought DVD+RW drives. We've been recommending DVD-RAM
drives from the beginning.
Brian Bilbrey commented
on the web access statistics I ran for my own and Jerry Pournelle's
sites a couple weeks ago, and wondered how they compared with those from a
year ago. I don't have Pournelle's old reports handy, but here are my own.
Those for the first two months of 2001 are on the left and the first two
months of 2002 on the right.
1:
Windows
84.78%
: Windows 98
39.94%
: Windows 2000
17.83%
: Windows NT
16.06%
: Windows 95
9.89%
: Unknown Windows
0.87%
: Windows 16-bit
0.08%
: Windows 3.1
0.07%
: Windows 32-bit
0.05%
: Windows CE
0.01%
2: OS unknown
8.60%
3: Unix
4.81%
: Linux
3.55%
: Other Unix
0.55%
: SunOS
0.32%
: IRIX
0.17%
: AIX
0.12%
: BSD
0.04%
: HP-UX
0.03%
: OSF1
0.02%
4: Macintosh
1.61%
: Macintosh PowerPC
1.38%
: Macintosh 68k
0.24%
: Unknown Macintosh
0.00%
5: OS/2
0.13%
6: WebTV
0.05%
7: BeOS
0.01%
8: Amiga
0.00%
9: RISC OS
0.00%
1:
Windows
86.59%
: Windows 98
31.76%
: Windows 2000
28.98%
: Windows NT
17.52%
: Unknown Windows
4.15%
: Windows 95
4.02%
: Windows 16-bit
0.09%
: Windows 3.1
0.06%
: Windows CE
0.00%
: Windows 32-bit
0.00%
2: OS unknown
5.74%
3: Unix
5.58%
: Linux
4.86%
: SunOS
0.36%
: Other Unix
0.18%
: AIX
0.14%
: BSD
0.02%
: OSF1
0.01%
: IRIX
0.00%
: HP-UX
0.00%
4: Macintosh
1.90%
: Macintosh PowerPC
1.84%
: Macintosh 68k
0.05%
: Unknown Macintosh
0.01%
5: OS/2
0.14%
6: WebTV
0.06%
7: BeOS
0.02%
8: Amiga
0.00%
9: OpenVMS
0.00%
Windows 9X is fading fast, with Windows 2000 showing a big gain. What
surprised me is that Windows NT 4 not only maintained its 1/6th share, but
actually increased it slightly. I'm not sure where XP shows up. It may be
buried in the Windows 2000 numbers, or it may account for that big jump in
"Unknown Windows".
Linux is coming on fast. The bump from 3.55% to 4.86% isn't large in
terms of percentage points, but is a 37% gain. If that growth rate
continues, Linux will have about 10% of the desktops accessing my site two
years from now. However, it may be significant that Linux had a 5.17%
share in February alone (versus 4.86% for January and February combined).
The use of Linux on the desktop may in fact be accelerating faster than it
appears. Of course, these numbers are based on only a few hundred thousand
hits, so they may not be all that significant. Time will tell.
9:23 -
There was supposed to be an astronomy club observation last night, but it
ended up hazy and cloudy enough that we didn't bother driving up to the
site. It's been a tough winter for observing. Either too cold, too cloudy,
or poor seeing. But at least it's starting to warm up, so perhaps we'll
get a chance to get out more over the coming weeks.
Someone may finally be doing something about the DMCA/SSSCA rights
grab. DigitalConsumer.org
appears to be a rallying point for consumers who are sick of having their
fair-use rights trampled by the music and movie industries and their
congressional lackeys. Interestingly, it doesn't appear this new group is
asking for money, just for your support. I haven't investigated the group.
For all I know, it could have been set up by the music and movie
industries to deflect real opposition. But it does appear to be saying and
doing the right things. The web page even provides a means for you to
enter a message that will be faxed to your congressman.