TTG Home »
Robert Home » Daynotes
Journal Home » Journal for Week of 28 May 2001
Daynotes
Journal
Week
of 28 May 2001
Latest
Update: Friday, 05 July 2002 09:16
|
Search Site [tips]
Visit
Barbara's Journal Page |
|
Monday,
28 May 2001
[Last
Week] [Monday] [Tuesday] [Wednesday]
[Thursday] [Friday] [Saturday]
[Sunday] [Next Week]
[Daynotes
Journal Messageboard] [HardwareGuys.com
Messageboard]
|
Memorial Day here in the U.S., the day set
aside to remember those who sacrificed to keep us free.
I'm going to take part of the day off, although I do want to finish
Chapter 12, DVD Drives, and get it off to my editor. I should have that
chapter as well as Chapter 13, Hard Disk Interfaces, up on the Subscribers
page tomorrow.
Very strange articles in the paper this morning. California can expect
to average 20 hours/week of rolling blackouts throughout the summer.
President Bush is headed there for a visit. Apparently, many Californians
blame him for the problems they've caused themselves. Let's see. They
don't have enough electrical power, so they want Bush to cap the wholesale
price of electricity, thereby guaranteeing that they have even less
electrical power. Duh. I've always said universal suffrage was a huge
mistake.
Then there's the article about the Catholic Archbishop getting married.
That's odd enough, but what's truly strange is that he was married by Sun
Myung Moon to a woman that Moon chose for him. Apparently, even Princes of
the Roman Catholic church sometimes join cults. A Moonie Archbishop. The
mind boggles.
Barbara made a mistake last night. She's decided not to allow Malcolm
to be growly/snarly any more. Every time he gets that way, she plans to
get in his face, growling back at him. Duncan was lying in the hall just
outside my office, minding his own business. Malcolm went into
confrontational mode, and approached Duncan, head down, growling, and
fangs showing. Barbara went over to separate them, got down on the floor
and started showing her fangs at Malcolm. Just then, Duncan and Malcolm
got into a furball, with Barbara in the middle of it. She got chomped in
the chest, we're not sure by which dog. Fortunately, it didn't break the
skin, but she has a 2" (5 cm) diameter bruise where one of them got
her. When I asked Barbara if I could post a picture, she said "I
don't think so, Tim." There are more details on Barbara's
page (probably more than you want to know...)
At any rate, Barbara dragged Malcolm down the stairs and tossed him
into his crate, which is still set up in the basement. We left him there
for an hour or so, and he calmed down. As usual, Malcolm came off the
loser, having been chomped in the face. Duncan really doesn't like to
fight, and will do anything to avoid it, but if a fight erupts, he wins.
Malcolm is a very nice dog. He's the most affectionate dog I've ever had.
But he and Duncan really don't like each other. We'll persevere until we
get past this problem, but it sure would have been better not to have it
in the first place.
Click
here to read or post responses to this week's journal entries
Click
here to read or post responses to the Linux Chronicles Forum
[Top] |
Tuesday,
29 May 2001
[Last
Week] [Monday] [Tuesday] [Wednesday]
[Thursday] [Friday] [Saturday]
[Sunday] [Next Week]
[Daynotes
Journal Messageboard] [HardwareGuys.com
Messageboard]
|
Yesterday I finished updating two
chapters--Chapter 12, DVD Drives and Chapter 13, Hard Disk
Interfaces--and sent them off to my editor. They're available for
download on the Subscribers Page
now. DVD Drives is a 150 KB Word 2000 document and Hard Disk Interfaces is
a 1,937 KB Word 2000 Document. If you care to read and comment on them,
I'd love to hear what you have to say. There are links on the subscribers'
page that you can click to provide feedback in the Subscribers Only forum
on the HardwareGuys.com messageboard. I'm working now on Chapter 14, Hard
Disk Drives. That one should be up in the next few days.
If you're not a subscriber and want to become one, click
here.
I ordered some telescope eyepieces yesterday. Mars will be at it's closest
approach in 13 years this summer, and we wanted a high-power eyepiece or
two to use for observing it. Even at its closest approach, Mars is a tiny
object, so we want to use as much power as the seeing will allow. In
theory, the maximum usable magnification is between 50X and 60X per inch
of aperture, which would amount to 500X to 600X with our scope. Anything
more than that gives empty magnification--a larger, dimmer image without
additional detail. In practice, the telescope itself is seldom the
bottleneck. The atmosphere itself seldom allows much more than
300X--perhaps 400X on a very good night--regardless of the size of the
scope. And on most nights 200X to 250X is the limit.
Our scope has a 1250 mm focal length. Magnification is determined by
dividing the focal length of the scope by the focal length of the
eyepiece, so for 250X we need a 5 mm eyepiece. There are two problems with
such short focal length eyepieces. First, the true field of view is very
narrow, which means when using an undriven scope like our Dobsonian
objects drift quickly out of the field of view. Second, most short focal
length eyepieces have next to no eye relief, which means you have to mash
your eye right down on the eye lens. In addition to being uncomfortable
and tending to get eyelashes and oil on the lens, that also means it's
very easy to touch the eyepiece, which can bump the object right out of
the field of view.
So, what I was looking for was a short focal length eyepiece with a
reasonable apparent field of view and decent eye relief. That's no problem
at all if one is willing to buy high-end eyepieces like Tele Vue Radians.
Those are wonderful eyepieces in nearly every respect. They have a 60
degree apparent field of view. They have 20 mm of eye relief, which is
actually more than I prefer. But they cost $228 each, and I wanted more
than one focal length. There are similar competing eyepieces from other
makers, including the Vixen Lanthanum Wide and the Pentax XL series, but
they're all priced similarly.
So I decided to check around some more. I came across a line of
eyepieces made by Siebert Optics
here in North Carolina. Harry Siebert uses military surplus optics to
produce a very inexpensive line of eyepieces that have most of the
features I wanted, including low price. The good thing about military
surplus lenses is that not only are they cheap but they're of superb
quality. The military doesn't screw around when it comes to specifying
level of polish, coatings, etc. If you're buying lenses for say a tank
sight, you don't risk a tank and crew to save a couple bucks on lenses.
Harry also uses relatively simple designs with few lens elements, which
contributes to bright, high-contrast images. He sells a lot of his
eyepieces on e-Bay, so I checked the buyer evaluations. There were
something like 637 total responses from 500+ unique responders. Of those
responses, Harry got zero negative evaluations, one neutral evaluation,
and all the rest positive evaluations. He also has a 30-day return policy,
so the risk of ordering from him is nil. I decided to order the following
eyepieces:
- 4.9 mm ($70)
- 7.0 mm ($45)
- 12.5 mm ($40)
- 21.0 mm ($40)
All have 7 mm of eye relief and 65 degree apparent field of view,
except the 21 mm, which has an 80 degree AFOV. The eye relief is a bit
tighter than I'd prefer, but it's usable, and getting longer eye relief
requires paying much more for a premium eyepiece. The 4.9 mm provides
about 255X natively, or 510X with a 2X Barlow, which is probably a bit
much. The 7 mm provides 179X/358X, the 12.5 mm 100X/200X, and the 21 mm
60X/120X. It'll be interesting to see how good the images look. From all
accounts, they should be excellent.
Click
here to read or post responses to this week's journal entries
Click
here to read or post responses to the Linux Chronicles Forum
[Top] |
Wednesday,
30 May 2001
[Last
Week] [Monday] [Tuesday]
[Wednesday] [Thursday] [Friday]
[Saturday] [Sunday] [Next
Week]
[Daynotes
Journal Messageboard] [HardwareGuys.com
Messageboard]
|
Barbara is gone all day today, off to play golf
with her father this morning, then to meet someone half-way between here
and Raleigh to pick up a rescue Border Collie, then to Mt. Airy to deliver
the BC to its new owners. She did leave some left-over casserole in the
refrigerator that I'm supposed to re-heat for dinner. That should be
within my culinary skills, just.
More trouble from the teenage punks last night. Barbara had gone back
to bed around 10:00. Just after 11:00, as I was sitting reading, I heard a
loud crash, as if a picture had fallen off a wall or something. I checked
around the house and couldn't find anything. This morning, when Barbara
came in with the dogs from First Time Out, she announced that she'd solved
the mystery. The punks had tossed a half-full can of beer at our house,
which she carried across the street and tossed back into the front yard of
one of the punk's houses.
I'm not sure what to do about this problem. I suggested calling the
police, but Barbara says they won't be able to do anything. She's probably
right. What I'd like to do one evening is amble down to the cul-de-sac
where a half dozen or so of them congregate, taking a witness or two along
with me. If one of the punks were foolish enough to take a swing at me...
A guy is entitled to defend himself, and if that results in six
hospitalized punks, oh well.
Click
here to read or post responses to this week's journal entries
Click
here to read or post responses to the Linux Chronicles Forum
[Top] |
Thursday,
31 May 2001
[Last
Week] [Monday] [Tuesday]
[Wednesday] [Thursday] [Friday]
[Saturday] [Sunday] [Next
Week]
[Daynotes
Journal Messageboard] [HardwareGuys.com
Messageboard]
|
Thanks to everyone who's suggested using
cameras to catch images of the punks in action. I'd actually thought about
that, and did a bit of checking. My first thought was to use web cams, but
those have two problems. First, the maximum resolution is only 640X480 at
best, and I need more than that to make sure I'm capturing enough detail.
Second, web cams typically have poor low-light performance. Most of those
I looked at, assuming I could find specifications for light sensitivity,
require something like 20+ lux, whereas I'd need something that would
function in anything from bright daylight down to a fraction of a lux. I
may rig up something with a couple of standard analog surveillance cameras
with overlapping fields of view, setting them to capture perhaps one frame
every five seconds and save it to disk. Or not. Right now, the punks are
annoying us, but I'm not sure I want to spend the time needed to deal with
them.
Barbara and I are off tomorrow to Doe Run Lodge, a resort up on the
Blue Ridge Parkway. We've stayed there two or three times before, but
never in one of the cabins, which are usually booked months in advance.
Barbara had always wanted to stay in one of the cabins, so she reserved
the Log Cabin for us.
My brother is coming over from Raleigh to mom/dog sit.
We're taking my Trooper, now known as AstroTruck because it's crammed
full of astronomy gear. We'll head up tomorrow and come back late Sunday,
so there probably won't be anything up here until next Monday morning. I
may have a short post up tomorrow morning, and perhaps a short post Sunday
afternoon, but no promises.
I've updated the HardwareGuys.com
web site with current picks for Removable
Storage and Optical
Storage.
More next week.
Click
here to read or post responses to this week's journal entries
Click
here to read or post responses to the Linux Chronicles Forum
[Top] |
Friday,
1 June 2001
[Last
Week] [Monday] [Tuesday]
[Wednesday] [Thursday]
[Friday] [Saturday] [Sunday]
[Next Week]
[Daynotes
Journal Messageboard] [HardwareGuys.com
Messageboard]
|
Last night the punks turned over Barbara's yard
cart, which was sitting at the curb full of grass clippings and other yard
waste. I think when we get back next week we'll call the police and tell
them we're being harassed by neighborhood teenagers. Not that there's much
they can or will do. Still, it's probably worth getting a complaint on
file.
Barbara and I will be packing up this morning for our trip up to Doe
Run Lodge on the Blue Ridge Parkway. It looks like the weather will be
cloudy and rainy, but that's okay. If we end up stuck in the cabin in the
rain with a bunch of books and a log fire, that's okay with us. We'll take
the telescope along just in case, but we probably won't have a chance to
use it.
We're both looking forward to the Mars opposition, which happens in a
couple of weeks. We're going to try to to observe one of Mars' moons.
There are two, Deimos and Phobos. They were discovered in 1877 by Asaph
Hall. He was using a 26" refractor, which at the time was the largest
such instrument in the world. Others had tried before then to locate
moons, but had failed. As is usually the case, once something has been
discovered, others see it with smaller and smaller instruments. I think
the record for the smallest scope that's resolved one of Mars' moons is
now 7 inches. So the "easier" moon may, with luck, be just
barely visible in our 10 inch scope.
Of the two moons, Phobos is about 26 by 22 kilometers and Deimos only
about 15 by 12 kilometers. Although Phobos is much larger and much
brighter, it's also much harder to observe. That's because Deimos, smaller
and dimmer, is also much farther away from Mars. Mars is so
bright--something like magnitude -2.2--that its light swamps that of the
tiny moons. Imagine staring at a searchlight from ten miles away, with
someone standing two feet from the searchlight holding a lit candle.
Resolving Deimos without being swamped by the light from Mars is similar
in difficulty to resolving the candle flame without being blinded by the
searchlight.
I may build an occulting eyepiece to help. To do that, I'll simply
unscrew the barrel from a regular eyepiece and put a thin strip of
aluminum foil across the field stop, which'll leave a black bar across the
field of view. We can nudge the scope to put Mars behind the black bar,
which leaves Deimos visible without the glare of Mars. Of course, we have
the advantage of knowing exactly where Deimos is in its orbit, which tells
us where to look. Still, it's pretty small and pretty dim.
I'd better get started packing up. Barbara and I went out to dinner and
the library yesterday, so I have twenty or so mysteries in my book bag.
That should hold me for a couple of days. I'm not taking a computer,
though, so there won't be anything up here until late Sunday at the
earliest, and probably Monday. My brother is coming over sometime, and
we'll be leaving as soon as he gets here.
Click
here to read or post responses to this week's journal entries
Click
here to read or post responses to the Linux Chronicles Forum
[Top] |
Saturday,
2 June 2001
[Last
Week] [Monday] [Tuesday]
[Wednesday] [Thursday] [Friday]
[Saturday] [Sunday] [Next
Week]
[Daynotes
Journal Messageboard] [HardwareGuys.com
Messageboard]
|
On vacation.
Click
here to read or post responses to this week's journal entries
Click
here to read or post responses to the Linux Chronicles Forum
[Top] |
Sunday,
3 June 2001
[Last
Week] [Monday] [Tuesday]
[Wednesday] [Thursday] [Friday]
[Saturday] [Sunday] [Next
Week]
[Daynotes
Journal Messageboard] [HardwareGuys.com
Messageboard]
|
On vacation.
Click
here to read or post responses to this week's journal entries
Click
here to read or post responses to the Linux Chronicles Forum
[Top] |
|